1936 to present
(continued):
No
account of post-1936 thylacine sightings would be complete without mention
of the Hans Naarding sighting along the Salmon River Road to the south
of Togari in 1982, and the Beasley sighting near Pyengana in 1995, as both
were made by experienced park rangers.
Hans
Naarding was an experienced field ranger with the Tasmanian Parks &
Wildlife Department, which makes this sighting one of the most credible
to date. Naarding states:
"It was raining heavily.
At 2 am I awoke and out of habit, scanned the surrounds with a spotlight.
As I swept the beam around, it came to rest on a large thylacine, standing
side on some six to seven metres distant. My camera bag was out of
immediate reach so I decided to examine the animal carefully before risking
movement. It was an adult male in excellent condition with 12 black
stripes on a sandy coat. Eye reflection was pale yellow. It
moved only once, opening its jaw and showing its teeth. After several
minutes of observation I attempted to reach for my camera bag but in doing
so I disturbed the animal and it moved away into the undergrowth.
Leaving the vehicle and moving to where the animal disappeared I noted
a strong scent. Despite an intensive search no further trace of the
animal could be found". |
.
Location
of the town of Togari (Tasmania). |
|
.
.
Recreation
of Hans Naarding's 1982 thylacine sighting at Togari, by Arnfinn Holderer
(2016), with technical contributions from C. Campbell and Dr. S. Sleightholme.
Click gear button in lower right corner and select "?" to view control
options for movement. This animation is copyright and unauthorized
use strictly prohibited.
|
.
This sighting was kept
confidential for two years whilst an extensive field search was carried
out over an area of 250km2 (155mi2),
but despite best efforts, no evidence was found of the thylacine.
That said, the official
government report into the sighting (Thylacine Files [Naarding Report],
Tasmanian Parks & Wildlife Service, Hobart) states: "It was concluded
that the search area was used irregularly by thylacines up until autumn
1982 but use has diminished due to increased disturbance to the point that
detection of animals is not probable, despite large efforts".
Importantly, the report concludes: "Unless the thylacine observed in
March 1982 by the Service biologist was the last of the species it must
be accepted that thylacines survive in a number of areas of Tasmania".
One could argue that
if this was the official conclusion reached on the Naarding sighting, why
then is the 1936 extinction date so readily accepted? If the thylacine
was believed to be extant in 1982, the species could not have officially
been declared extinct until 2032, if the old IUCN 50-year rule (applicable
at that time) was applied.
Charles Beasley was
a summer Interpretative Ranger with the Department of Environment &
Land Management based at St Helens on the East Coast of Tasmania.
On the 25th January 1995, he claims to have seen what he believed to be
a juvenile thylacine at a site inland from St Helens in the dry sclerophyll
forest in the Pyengana region. |
.
.
Location
of Pyengana (Tasmania). |
|
The sighting occurred just before dusk at 20:15 hours. Beasley was
alone, sitting, bird watching across a valley using 8 x 40 power binoculars.
At 20:15 he noticed an animal standing sniffing the air on a ledge 350
metres away. Beasley was sitting below the ledge and therefore could
not see the animal's legs and feet. He described the animal as: "dirty
brown in colour with black stripes down its rib cage and about half the
size of a full grown Alsatian dog. It had a face like a Staffordshire
bull terrier but more elongated. The animal stretched, turned and
walked back into dense scrub, the tail was heavy and somewhat like that
of a kangaroo and was held out in a gentle curve". Beasley estimates
to have viewed the animal for two minutes and there were no further sightings
of the animal in the following 15 minutes until he left.
Following the sighting,
heavy rains in the area obliterated any possible evidence of tracks.
An official search was carried out, but no evidence was found of the thylacine. |
.
It should be noted that Nick Mooney of the Parks & Wildlife Department
commented in a later television documentary that Mr. Beasley was employed
as a "seasonal" or "temporary" ranger with the Department, and fairly inexperienced
in identifying wildlife. He also questioned the reliability of a
sighting at over 350 metres.
In May 2002, an environmental scientist on a field trip to Tasmania sighted
a juvenile thylacine, and on the following day, an adult. These sightings,
together with a wealth of sub-proof evidence, resulted in the publication
of a free online book entitled "Magnificent
Survivor - Continued Existence of the Tasmanian Tiger", which all
with an interest in the thylacine should read.
From the wealth of sightings evidence, it can be seen that considerable
doubt exists to presume that the thylacine became extinct with the death
of Benjamin in 1936. Sleightholme & Campbell (2015) state: "with
near certainty" that this was not the case. The "real" argument
centres on whether the thylacine is now extinct, or critically
endangered. Over the last century, a number of species
presumed to be extinct were rediscovered in the wild. These are often
referred to as "Lazarus" species: |
.
.
Mahogany
Glider
(Petaurus gracilis)
.
|
|
.
Takahe
(Porphyrio hochstetteri)
.
|
|
.
Laotian
Rock Rat
(Laonastes aenigmamus)
.
|
|
.
.
.
Cuban
Solenodon
(Atopogale cubanus)
.
|
|
.
Bermuda
Petrel
(Pterodroma cahow)
.
|
|
.
Madagascar
Serpent Eagle
(Eutriorchis astur)
.
|
|
.
.
.
Brindled
Nail-tailed Wallaby
(Onychogalea fraenata)
.
|
|
.
New
Holland Mouse
(Pseudomys novaehollandiae)
.
|
|
.
Gilbert's
Potoroo
(Potorous gilbertii)
.
|
|
.
.
.
Leadbeater's
Possum
(Gymnobelideus leadbeateri)
.
|
|
.
Yellow-tailed
Woolly Monkey
(Lagothrix flavicauda)
.
|
|
.
Arakan
Forest Turtle
(Heosemys depressa)
.
|
|
Like the thylacine,
the majority of the mammals on the "Lazarus" list are both nocturnal
and forest or forest edge dwellers. Most are timid, and consequently,
rarely seen. A population within this group that is easy to sample
is rare. Animals move - sometimes over enormous distances, habitats
are difficult or impossible to access, and entire populations may be adept
at avoiding capture. For most populations, it is impossible to count
every individual. These factors may provide some explanation as to
why so many species, including the thylacine, "disappear" from the zoological
record for many decades before being rediscovered. |