.
.
Dr.
David Fleay's famous photograph of the thylacine we have come to know by
the name of Benjamin, taken in December 1933 at the Beaumaris Zoo
(QD). This image illustrates the thylacine's threat-yawn response,
which is also displayed by various other species of dasyuromorphian
marsupials. Photo courtesy: David Fleay Trustees. |
The name "Benjamin",
now synonymous with the last captive thylacine, is said to originate from
the recollections of a Mr. Frank Darby, who claimed in a 1968 radio interview
with the naturalist Graham Pizzey that he had once been the animal's keeper.
However, Robert Paddle (2000), in his search through the Beaumaris Zoo's
records, could find no documentation to support Darby's claim. Further,
when interviewed, Alison
Reid (daughter of Arthur Reid, the curator at the Beaumaris
Zoo) denied that anyone by the name of Frank Darby had ever been employed
at the zoo, and confirmed that the name "Benjamin" was never used
as a "pet" name for the zoo's last thylacine. Darby's comments should
therefore be regarded as being somewhat spurious.
As the name "Benjamin"
has since entered common usage when reference is made to the last known
captive thylacine, little would be gained in campaigning to alter this.
In some respects, it is appropriate in focusing people's perceptions of
the species and when discussing aspects of conservation. On a practical
front, it is far simpler to say "Benjamin" than to use the rather
loquacious phrase "the last known captive thylacine". It is
in this context that the name Benjamin will be used throughout this
website.
The debate: |
.
.
Walter
Mullins.
Photograph
copyright and courtesy: Rose Lewis (née Mullins) (private collection). |
|
Historically, there has been considerable debate pertaining to both the
source and sex of Benjamin. Until recently, thoughts on its source
were polarised into two lines of opinion:
The Mullins family group:
The first position (now
discredited) was that Benjamin was the surviving member of a
family group comprised of a mother and her three pups, caught by Walter
"Jack" Mullins at Tyenna in the Florentine Valley in June 1923, and subsequently
sold to the Beaumaris Zoo (QD) on the 5th February 1924 for the sum of
£55.
The Mercury newspaper
of the 12th February 1924 (p. 6) records the arrival of the family of "tigers"
at the zoo:
"Tiger Family at
Zoo - A highly interesting addition, in the shape of a family of Tasmanian
tigers been made to the Beaumaris Zoo this week. This comprises a
female adult and three young ones, about seven months old, who come from
the rough and heavily timbered country in the Tyenna Valley. When
captured the young were found in their mother's pouch, being then only
a few weeks old, and have been successfully reared in captivity for some
six months, when they were handed over to the City Council entirely devoid
of ferocity, but playful and sufficiently tame to feed from their keeper's
hand, as well as handsomely marked with brown and black, the little ones
are sure to attract considerable attention by visitors to the zoo for the
next few weeks. Although given a supply of chopped up meat, they
are not altogether at a stage when they are independent of their maternal
diet". |
.
Mullins regularly exhibited his captive thylacines around country shows
within Tasmania and on a brief visit to Melbourne, before eventually selling
them to the Beaumaris Zoo (QD). The Mercury newspaper of the 11th
December 1923 (p. 10) notes:
"Mr. Walter Mullins
had on view at the sports a female Tasmanian tiger and three young ones
six months old which he had captured in the bush near Tyenna in June last.
The young are very prettily marked. Mr. Mullins will exhibit these
animals at the New Norfolk regatta".
An article entitled "Sports at Fitzgerald" from the World newspaper
of the 10th December 1923 (p. 7) states:
"Mr. Mullins was showing his Tasmanian Tiger with her three cubs, and they
were certainly worthy of inspection. The mother is quite a graceful
animal, while the kittens were as playful as spaniels".
Mr. Ron Smith gives his account of seeing the Mullins family group in a
letter to a Mr. G. Weindorfer dated 5th January 1924 (Source: TAHO, Launceston,
Ref: LMSS150/1/1):
"The young ones were nearly as big as full grown rabbits; two of them were
sucking for all they were worth, and the other was asleep. The mother
was about as big as an ordinary collie, but slenderer. Large brown
eyes, and the face in front of the eyes narrower than a dog's. Fur
more like a possum's than a dog's. Altogether a very pretty animal".
The World newspaper of the 6th February 1924 (p. 5) confirms that even
though the Beaumaris Zoo (QD) had two thylacines on display in 1924, Mullins's
thylacines, as fairground attractions, still attracted a steady stream
of visitors:
"Despite the fact that the Hobart Zoo contains two fine specimens of the
Tasmanian Tiger, the sign 'Wild Animals from Van Diemen's Land, Tasmanian
Tigers," attracted a steady stream of patrons who gladly parted with the
nimble shilling to gaze on the products of their native isle". |
.
Source: The Examiner
newspaper,
18th January 1924 (p. 4).
|
|
|
. |